Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Practice Exam

CPC Practice Exam and Study Guide Package

Practice Exam

What makes a good CPC Practice Exam? Questions and Answers with Full Rationale

CPC Exam Review Video

Laureen shows you her proprietary “Bubbling and Highlighting Technique”

Download your Free copy of my "Medical Coding From Home Ebook" at the top left corner of this page

Practice Exam

2016 CPC Practice Exam Answer Key 150 Questions With Full Rationale (HCPCS, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT Codes) Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions with Full Rationale Answers

Practice Exam

Click here for more sample CPC practice exam questions and answers with full rationale

Tag Archives: Payment

Ready CDI teams for CMS’ proposed expansion of mandatory ortho episode payment models

Ready CDI teams for CMS’ proposed expansion of mandatory ortho episode payment models

by Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, an AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer

If your hospital resides in one of the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) required to participate in the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Model (CJR), you will also be required to participate in a new orthopedic payment model called ‘SHFFT’ (surgical hip and femur fracture treatment) if an August 2 proposed rule is finalized. The impact? The following assigned MS-DRGs will no longer define hospital reimbursement:

  • Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity (MS-DRGs 469, 470)
  • Hip and Femur Procedures Except Major Joint (MS-DRGs 480, 481, 482)

 

MS-DRGs 469 and 470 are included in the CJR, which we have discussed in prior articles. Let’s take a look at the proposed SHFFT episode payment model (EPM), which involves the other three MS-DRGs, and see what role the CDI program can play as reimbursement shifts to episode-based payments.

Model overview

The episode of care defined for the SHFFT EPM begins with an admission to a participating hospital of a fee-for-service Medicare patient assigned MS-DRGs 480?482. This admission is referred to as the anchor hospitalization. The episode continues 90 days post-discharge from the hospital, and payments for all related Part A and Part B services are included in the episode payment bundle. CMS holds the hospital accountable for defined cost and quality outcomes during the episode and links reimbursement?which may consist of payment penalties and/or financial incentives?to outcome performance.

This is a mandatory EPM for hospitals already impacted by the CJR; the SHFFT model will apply to the same 67 geographic MSAs. The EPM is proposed to begin July 1, 2017, and will last for five years, ending in December 2021.

 

Cost outcomes

CMS will initially pay the hospital and all providers who bill for services during the episode using the usual fee-for-service models. Thus, the SHFFT EPM will not impact the revenue cycle at first. However, at the end of each performance period, which typically represents 12 months (January through December), CMS will compare or reconcile the actual costs with a preestablished ‘target price.’

CMS will set target prices using an approach that will phase in a blended rate of hospital to regional costs. In recognition of the higher costs associated with discharges in MS-DRGs with an MCC or CC, CMS has developed an algorithm to adjust the target price for this subset of the patient population.

If the reconciliation process indicates that the costs to deliver services for the episode were higher than the target price, CMS will require repayment from the hospital. If, however, the costs to deliver care for the episode were lower than the target price, CMS will provide additional payments to the hospital for the provided services. To receive additional payments, however, performance for defined quality outcomes must meet or exceed established standards.

Quality-adjusted target price

To receive any earned financial incentives, the hospital must meet or exceed performance standards for established quality outcomes. CMS therefore adjusts the target price based on quality performance, referred to as the quality-adjusted target price.

The SHFFT EPM uses the exact same quality outcomes as those defined for the CJR:

  • Patient experience. This is the HCAHPS measure also used in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP). The source of information for this measure is the HCAHPS survey.
  • Patient-reported outcome data. As with the CJR, the hospital can collect and submit patient-reported data elements and at present will earn quality composite points for submitting the data. These data elements are collected both before and after the procedure and will be used by CMS to create a functional status measurement tool.
  • THA/TKA complication rates. This is the Hospital-Level Risk Standardized Complication Rate (RSCR) following the THA/TKA measure. This measure already impacts financial performance under the HVBP. Like the CJR, performance for this measure is weighted the heaviest in the quality composite comprising 50% of the composite score.

 

Hospital (accountable party), collaborators, and Advanced Payment Models

The hospital is held accountable for episode cost and quality outcomes and all associated financial risks/rewards, even though a variety of providers deliver services and impact performance. As with the CJR, the hospital has been designated as the accountable party because CMS believes the hospital is best positioned to influence coordinated, efficient delivery of services from the patient’s initial hospitalization through recovery.

CMS permits the hospital to enter into collaborative arrangements with physicians and other providers to support and redesign care delivery across the episode and to share financial gains and/or losses. The proposed rule expands the list of collaborators defined in the previous CJR final rule to include other hospitals and Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organizations.

The proposed rule also provides an Advanced Payment Model (APM) track for the EPMs, an important step that will further incentivize collaborator participation.

 

CDI program opportunities

There are five key ways that clinical documentation and reported codes across the continuum impact SHFFT performance:

  • Identification of patients included in the EPM. The assigned MS-DRG impacts which discharges are included in the cohort. As one example, consider a patient who would fall into the EPM (MS-DRGs 480?482) unless he or she has a bone biopsy. If reported, the bone biopsy would result in assignment of different MS-DRGs (477?479) and the discharge would not be included in the EPM.
  • Establishment of target costs. The capture of the MCC and/or CC impacts establishment of the episode target price.
  • Determination of related costs. The costs for hospital readmissions within the episode are included in episode costs if the readmissions are related. The assigned MS-DRG for the readmission determines whether the readmission is related.

The costs associated with Part B claims are included in episode costs if the services are related. The primary diagnosis for each visit determines whether the visit is related.

  • Reported complications. Assignment of ICD codes for the following conditions are counted as complications when those conditions result in inpatient readmission:
  • Complication risk adjustment. As with other hospital-centric measures such as risk-adjusted readmission and mortality rates, comorbidities reported for the 12 months prior to the anchor hospitalization are used to assess case-mix complexity. The CMS risk adjustment module uses defined comorbidity categories to identify conditions that impacted predicted rates of complications for the THA/TKA cohort.

The capture of at least one condition for each of the 28 comorbid categories over the 12-month period will strengthen risk adjustment and RSCR performance. RSCR performance contributes to 50% of the quality composite score, which, in turn, impacts the quality-adjusted target price.

 

Summary

Together the CJR and SHFFT models cover all surgical treatment options (hip arthroplasty and fixation) for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fractures. These MS-DRGs typically represent one of the largest inpatient surgical volumes for most short-term acute care hospitals.

As hospitals and collaborators assess and refine the management of patients to achieve or exceed the quality-adjusted target price, the data we submit on claims will be used to assess our performance. The CDI program in the inpatient and ambulatory setting must be positioned to promote and support the capture and reporting of impactful documentation.

Additional information on the proposed rule can be located at https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/epm.

 

 

Editor’s note

Newell is the director of CDI quality initiatives for Enjoin. Her team provides CDI programs with education, infrastructure design, and audits to successfully and sustainably address the transition to value-based payments. She has extensive operational and consulting expertise in coding and clinical documentation improvement, case management, and health information management. You can reach Newell at 704-931-8537 or shannon.newell@enjoincdi.com.

HCPro.com – HIM Briefings

[Announcement] Private Payor Prices Will Be Used By Medicare to Set Payment Rates for Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Tests Beginning in 2018

Clinical Lab Tests

On June 17, CMS released a final rule implementing Section 216(a) of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA), requiring laboratories performing clinical diagnostic laboratory tests to report the amounts paid by private insurers for laboratory tests. Medicare will use these private insurer rates to calculate Medicare payment rates for laboratory tests paid under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS) beginning January 1, 2018.

The final rule includes provisions to ease administrative burdens for physician office laboratories and smaller independent laboratories. The final rule will generally require reporting entities to report private payor rates and test volumes for laboratory tests if an applicable laboratory receives at least $ 12,500 in Medicare revenues from laboratory services paid under the CLFS and more than 50 percent of its Medicare revenues from laboratory and/or physician services.

For the system’s first year, laboratories will collect private payor data from January 1, 2016, through June 30, 2016, and report it to CMS between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2017. CMS will calculate and post the new Medicare rates by early November 2017. These rates will take effect on January 1, 2018.

For More Information:

 

See the full text of this excerpted CMS press release (issued June 17).

The Medical Management Institute – MMI – Medical Coding News & MMI Updates

[Announcement] Helping Small Practices Prepare for the Quality Payment Program

The Quality Payment Program is proposed to implement the new, bipartisan law changing how Medicare pays clinicians, known as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). On June 20, HHS announced $ 20 million to fund on-the-ground training and education for Medicare clinicians in individual or small group practices of 15 clinicians or fewer. These funds will help provide hands-on training tailored to small practices, especially those that practice in historically under-resourced areas including rural areas, health professional shortage areas, and medically underserved areas.

As required by MACRA, HHS will continue to award $ 20 million each year over the next five years, providing $ 100 million in total to help small practices successfully participate in the Quality Payment Program. In order to receive funding, organizations must demonstrate their ability to strategically provide customized training to clinicians. And, most importantly, these organizations will provide education and consultation about the Quality Payment Program at no cost to the clinician or their practice. Awardees will be announced by November 2016.

For More Information:

 

See the full text of this excerpted HHS press release (issued June 20).

The Medical Management Institute – MMI – Medical Coding News & MMI Updates

Inpatient Hospital Payment Rate Impacted by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016


CMS is currently revising the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) FY 2016 Pricer to reflect the new payment calculation requirement.  The amount of the payment with respect to the operating costs of inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital for inpatient hospital discharges on or after January 1, 2016, will be based on 0 percent of the applicable Puerto Rico percentage and 100 percent of the applicable Federal percentage. In addition, the IPPS FY 2016 Pricer will include conforming changes to certain FY 2016 IPPS operating rates and factors that result from the application of the new Puerto Rico hospital payment calculation requirement, which are applicable to all IPPS hospital discharges on or after January 1, 2016. We will also incorporate the revised IPPS rates into the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Pricer, as they are used for certain LTCH claims payments.

To allow sufficient time to develop and test, CMS will implement the IPPS and LTCH Pricers on April 4, 2016. Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) will reprocess IPPS inpatient claims from Puerto Rico and all other IPPS hospitals with a discharge date on or after January 1, 2016. The MACs will also reprocess LTCH claims with a discharge date on or after January 1, 2016, due to the impact of this change.  Puerto Rico hospitals (as well as all other IPPS and LTCH hospitals) do not need to take any action. We expect to reprocess claims no later than June 30, 2016.


Coding Ahead

New Payment Models and Rewards for Better Care at Lower Cost

Originally Published by CMS.gov

On July 25, 2016, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) proposed new models that continue to shift Medicare reimbursements from quantity to quality by creating strong incentives for hospitals to deliver better care at a lower cost. These models would reward hospitals that work together with physicians and other providers to avoid complications, prevent hospital readmissions, and speed recovery.

Background

Under the proposed episode payment models, the hospital in which a patient is admitted for care for a heart attack, bypass surgery, or surgical hip/femur fracture treatment  would be accountable for the cost and quality of care provided to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries during the inpatient stay and for 90 days after discharge. Participating hospitals will receive a separate target price for each MS-DRG under the model. All providers and suppliers would be paid under the usual payment system rules and procedures of the Medicare program for episode services throughout the year. At the end of a model performance year, actual spending for the episode (total expenditures for related services under Medicare Parts A and B) would be compared to the Medicare quality-adjusted target episode price that reflects episode quality for the responsible hospital. Hospitals that work with physicians and other providers to deliver the needed care for less than the quality-adjusted target price, while meeting or exceeding quality standards, would be paid the savings achieved. Hospitals with costs exceeding the quality-adjusted target price would be required to repay Medicare.

Episode Payment Model Details

Setting Target Prices for Specific Conditions

Each year, CMS would set target prices for different episodes based on historical data on total costs related to the episode for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries admitted for heart attacks, bypass surgery, or surgical hip/femur fracture treatment, beginning with the hospitalization and extending 90 days following discharge. Target prices would be adjusted based on the complexity of treating a heart attack or providing bypass surgery. For example, CMS proposes to adjust prices upwards for those heart attack patients who need to be transferred to a different hospital during their care to reflect the most resource-intensive cardiac care provided during the hospitalization. For heart attack patients, target prices would also differ depending on whether the patient was treated with surgery or medical management.

Target prices would be based on a blend of hospital-specific data and regional historical data:

July 1, 2017 – December 31, 2018 (performance years 1 and 2): Two-thirds participant-specific data and one-third regional data;

2019 (performance year 3): One-third participant-specific data and two-thirds regional data; and

2020 – 2021 (performance years 4 and 5): Only regional data.

 

Paying More for Higher-Quality Care

Under the proposed bundled payment models, hospitals that delivered higher-quality care would be eligible to be paid a higher amount of savings than those with lower quality performance. Specifically, an individual hospital’s quality-adjusted target price would be based on a 1.5 to 3 percent discount rate relative to historical spending, with the lowest discount percentage for those hospitals providing the highest-quality care. Payments would be based on a quality-first principle: only hospitals meeting quality standards would be paid the savings from providing care for less than the quality-adjusted target price.

Hospitals would be assessed based on quality metrics appropriate to each episode, using performance and improvement on required measures that are already used in other CMS programs and submission of voluntary data for other quality measures in development or implementation testing:

Heart attacks:

Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate Following Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Hospitalization (NQF #0230)   
Excess Days in Acute Care after Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Survey (NQF #0166)
Voluntary Hybrid Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Mortality eMeasure (NQF #2473) data submission

 
Bypass surgery:

Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery (NQF #2558)
HCAHPS Survey (NQF #0166)

Hip/femur fractures (same measures as in the existing Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model):

Hospital-Level Risk-Standardized Complication Rate Following Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) (NQF #1550)
HCAHPS Survey (#0166)
Voluntary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)/Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and Limited Risk Variable data submission

As part of implementing the new models, CMS would provide hospitals with tools to help them improve care coordination and deliver higher-quality care. Proposed activities include providing participants with relevant spending and utilization data, waiving certain Medicare requirements to facilitate development of novel approaches to the delivery of care, and facilitating the sharing of best practices between participants through a learning and diffusion program.

Phased Implementation

Recognizing that hospitals will need time to adapt to the new models and establish processes to coordinate care, the proposed rule includes a number of measures to ease the transition, including gradually phasing-in risk.

Downside risk (possible repayments to Medicare) would be phased in:

 July 2017 – March 2018 (performance year 1 and quarter 1 of performance year 2):  No repayment;
April 2018 – December 2018 (quarters 2 through 4 of performance year 2): Capped at 5 percent;
2019 (performance year 3): Capped at 10 percent; and
2020 – 2021 (performance years 4 and 5): Capped at 20 percent.

Gains (payments from Medicare to hospitals) would be phased in:

 July 2017 – December 2018 (performance years 1 and 2): Capped at 5 percent;
2019 (performance year 3): Capped at 10 percent; and
2020 – 2021 (performance years 4 and 5): Capped at 20 percent.

The first performance period would run from July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. The second through fifth performance periods would align with calendar years 2018 through 2021.

How the Bundled Payments Would Work: An Example

Consider hospitals in model years 4 and 5 in a region where Medicare historically spent an average of $ 50,000 for each coronary bypass surgery patient, taking into account the costs of surgery as well as all related care provided in the 90 days after hospital discharge. Target prices would reflect the average historical pricing minus the discount rate based on quality performance and improvement.

Hospital A is performing at the highest overall level on quality measures and its discount rate is 1.5 percent for the episode. As a result, its quality-adjusted target price for bypass surgery is $ 49,250 (or $ 50,000 minus the discount of $ 750). By taking measures to avoid readmissions and other unnecessary costs, Hospital A is able to reduce average total hospitalization and related 90-day post-discharge costs for bypass surgery patients to $ 48,000. Hospital A would be paid average savings of $ 1,250 per patient. Hospital B in the same region also reduces its average costs to $ 48,000 per patient. However, it achieves only acceptable overall performance on quality measures. Its discount rate is 3 percent and its quality-adjusted target price is $ 48,500 (or $ 50,000 minus the discount of $ 1,500). Hospital B would be paid average savings of only $ 500 per patient. Hospital B in the same region also reduces its average costs to $ 48,000 per patient. However, it achieves only acceptable overall performance on quality measures. Its discount rate is 3 percent and its quality-adjusted target price is $ 48,500 (or $ 50,000 minus the discount of $ 1,500). Hospital B would be paid average savings of only $ 500 per patient. 

Participants in the New Bundles

For the new cardiac bundles, participants would be hospitals in 98 randomly-selected metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Hospitals outside these geographic areas would not participate in the model.  There is no application process for hospitals for these models.

Because the hip/femur fracture surgeries model builds upon the existing CJR model, CMS proposes to test these bundled payments in the same 67 MSAs that were selected for that model.

Rural counties are excluded from the models. In addition, CMS proposes to limit financial risk for the remaining rural hospitals that are located in participating MSAs, such as sole community hospitals, Medicare-dependent hospitals, and rural referral centers.  Specifically, these hospitals’ total losses are limited to 3 percent for the second through fourth quarters of 2018 and 5 percent for 2019 through 2021.

Collaboration with Other Providers

One of the major goals of bundled payments is to encourage coordination among all providers involved in a patient’s care: for example, collaboration between hospitals and physicians and skilled nursing facilities. Therefore, as in the CJR model, CMS is proposing to allow hospital participants to enter into financial arrangements with other types of providers (for example, skilled nursing facilities and physicians), as well as with Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Those arrangements would allow hospital participants to share reconciliation payments, internal cost savings, and the responsibility for repayment to Medicare with other providers and entities who choose to enter into these arrangements, subject to the limitations outlined in the proposed rule.

Evaluation

As noted above, preliminary results from other tests of bundled payments for cardiac and orthopedic care suggest that these models have strong potential to improve patient care while reducing costs. Because they will include a wide range of hospitals around the country, the models announced today will allow CMS to test the impact of bundles on quality and cost when implemented at scale and across all types of providers and patients.

CMS’s evaluation of the models will examine quality during the episode period, after the episode ends, and for longer durations such as one year mortality rates. CMS will examine outcomes and patient experience measures such as mortality, readmissions, complications, and other clinically relevant outcomes. The evaluation will include both quantitative and qualitative data and will use a variety of methods and measures in assessing quality. The outcomes examined will include: claims-based measures such as hospital readmission rates, emergency room visits rates, and the amount of care deferred beyond the 90-day post-hospital discharge episode duration; HCAHPS satisfaction and care experience measures; and functional performance change scores from the patient assessment instruments in home health agencies and skilled nursing facilities. In addition, CMS plans for the evaluation to include a beneficiary survey that will be used to assess the impact of the model on beneficiary perceptions of access, satisfaction, mobility, and other relevant functional performance measures.

In addition to the formal evaluation, CMS is proposing continuous monitoring of arrangements between participants and collaborators and auditing of patients’ medical records to allow early detection of and intervention in any quality concerns.  

 

Additional Information

The Medical Management Institute – MMI – Medical Coding News & MMI Updates

Payment for G0101 and Q0091 in Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)


The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has determined that HCPCS codes G0101 (Cervical or vaginal cancer screening; pelvic and clinical breast examination) and Q0091 (screening Papanicolaou smear) are billable visits when furnished by a RHC or FQHC practitioner to a RHC or FQHC patient.

CR8927 instructs MACs to allow HCPCS codes G0101 and Q0091 to be billed as a standalone encounter/visit. These services will be paid the AIR on RHC and FQHC claims for 71X and 77X Types of Bills (TOBs), effective for dates of service on or after January 1, 2014. Please note that deductible and coinsurance are NOT to be applied to G0101 or Q0091. If other billable visits are furnished on the same day as G0101 or Q0091, only one visit will be paid.

G0101 or Q0091 are payable annually for women at high risk for developing cervical or vaginal cancer, and women of childbearing age who have had an abnormal Pap test within the past 3 years. It is payable every 2 years for women at normal risk. For FQHCs billing under the PPS, G0101 and Q0091 are qualifying visits when billed with FQHC payment HCPCS codes G0466 or G0467.

Please note: MAC will not search for claims that have been denied with HCPCS code G0101 or Q0091 prior to the implementation of CR8927, but will adjust any claims that you bring to their attention.

Reference: http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM8927.pdf


Coding Ahead

[Announcement] Hospice Benefit: Final FY 2017 Payment and Policy Change

Hospice

Originally Published in MLN Connects

On July 29, CMS issued a final rule (CMS-1652-F) outlining FY 2017 Medicare payment rates and wage index and the Hospice Quality Reporting Program (QRP) for hospices serving Medicare beneficiaries. As finalized, hospices would see a 2.1 percent ($ 350 million) increase in their payments for FY 2017 (reflecting an estimated 2.7 percent inpatient hospital market basket update, reduced by a 0.3 percentage point productivity adjustment and a 0.3 percentage point adjustment required by law).

Changes to the Hospice QRP:

• Provides a description of the Hospice CAHPS® Survey and outlines participation requirements for the FY 2019 and FY 2020 annual payment updates
• Finalizes two new quality measures for FY 2017
• CMS expects to begin public reporting hospice quality measures via a Compare site in CY 2017

Enhanced Data Collection:

• CMS is considering enhancing the current Hospice Item Set (HIS) data collection instrument to be more in line with other post-acute care settings
• This revised data collection instrument would be a comprehensive patient assessment instrument, rather than the current chart abstraction tool

For More Information:

• Final Rule will become effective on October 1, 2016
• Hospice Center website

 

See the full text of this excerpted CMS fact sheet (issued July 29).

The Medical Management Institute – MMI – Medical Coding News & MMI Updates

[Announcement] SNFs: Final FY 2017 Payment and Policy Changes

On July 29, CMS issued a final rule (CMS-1645-F) outlining FY 2017 Medicare payment policies and rates for the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS), the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), and the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. CMS projects that aggregate payments to SNFs will increase in FY 2017 by $ 920 million, or 2.4 percent, from payments in FY 2016. This estimated increase is attributable to a 2.7 percent market basket increase reduced by 0.3 percentage points, in accordance with the multifactor productivity adjustment required by law.

Changes to the SNF QRP:

• Adopts three measures to meet the resource use and other measure domains and one measure to satisfy the domain of medication reconciliation
• SNFs that fail to submit the required quality data to CMS will be subject to a 2 percentage point reduction to the annual market basket percentage update factor for fiscal years beginning with FY 2018
• Policies and procedures associated with public reporting are being finalized, including the reporting timelines, preview period, review and correction of assessment-based and claims-based quality measure data, and the provision of confidential feedback reports to SNFs

SNF VBP Program:

• Specifies the SNF 30-Day Potentially Preventable Readmission Measure, (SNFPPR), as the all-cause, all-condition risk-adjusted potentially preventable hospital readmission measure as required by law

• Finalized additional policies, including establishing performance standards, establishing baseline and performance periods, adopting a performance scoring methodology, and providing confidential feedback reports to SNFs

For More Information:

• Final Rule will become effective on October 1, 2016
• SNF PPS website
• SNF QRP webpage
• SNF VBP webpage

 

See the full text of this excerpted CMS fact sheet (issued July 29).

The Medical Management Institute – MMI – Medical Coding News & MMI Updates

[Announcement] IRFs: Final FY 2017 Payment and Policy Change

On July 29, CMS issued a final rule (CMS-1647-F) outlining FY 2017 Medicare payment policies and rates for the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) and the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP). CMS is updating the IRF PPS payments for FY 2017 to reflect an estimated 1.65 percent increase factor (reflecting an IRF-specific market basket estimate of 2.7 percent, reduced by a 0.3 percentage point multi-factor productivity adjustment and a 0.75 percentage point reduction required by law). An additional approximate 0.3 percent increase to aggregate payments due to updating the outlier threshold results in an overall estimated update of approximately 1.9 percent (or $ 145 million), relative to payments in FY 2016.

• No changes to the facility-level adjustment
• Rural adjustment transition: Continue year two of the phase-out of the 14.9 percent rural adjustment for IRF providers in areas that were designated as rural and changed to urban under the new Office of Management and Budget delineations

    Changes to the IRF QRP:

    • Adopts three measures to meet the resource use and other measure domains and one measure to satisfy the domain of medication reconciliation
    • IRFs that fail to submit the required quality data to CMS will be subject to a 2 percentage point reduction to their applicable FY annual increase factor
    • Begin publically reporting IRF quality data in fall 2016
    • Adopted an extension of the time frame for submission of exception and extension requests for extraordinary circumstances from 30 days to 90 days from the date of the qualifying event

      For More Information:

      • Final Rule will become effective on October 1, 2016
      • IRF PPS website
      • IRF QRP website

        See the full text of this excerpted CMS fact sheet (issued July 29).

        The Medical Management Institute – MMI – Medical Coding News & MMI Updates